Saturday, October 11, 2008

Honda’s natural gas car named “Greenest Vehicle of 2008”

Honda’s Civic GX natural gas car has been named by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) as the greenest vehicle of 2008 for the fifth consecutive year.

According to a report in ENN (Environmental News Network), three other Honda vehicles also featured in the top list of the ACEEE.

In the 11th annual ACEEE's ranking of environmentally responsible vehicles, the natural gas-powered Civic GX ranked first with the gasoline Civic, Fit and Civic Hybrid joining the list of the 12 most environmentally-conscious vehicles available to the public.

This is the eighth year in a row that a Honda vehicle received the number one ranking and the seventh consecutive year that Honda vehicles held at least four positions in the top 12, an impressive one-third of all vehicles on the list.

For determining the rankings, the ACEEE used a singular measure that incorporates fuel economy, health-related pollution impacts and global warming emissions.

All vehicles are then analyzed and given a "Green Score." This score is used in ACEEE's ranking system, resulting in a ranking of each vehicle's total environmental performance, including a list of the 12 "greenest" and 12 "meanest" vehicles.

According to the report, the Civic GX, first introduced in 1998, is the cleanest internal combustion vehicle certified by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and is 90% cleaner than the average gasoline-powered car on the road today. 

Friday, October 3, 2008

Soleckshaws hit city streets

It's being touted as the poor man's Nano. Powered by solar energy and pedals, eco-friendly Soleckshaw rickshaws hit the streets on Thursday.
Designed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in eight months, these rickshaws will be battery operated. "The battery that's inbuilt will be charged by solar energy. It will transmit the energy to a gear system which will move the three wheels of the rickshaw. Though pedalling is not required, if pedalled the Soleckshaw will gain more power,'' said A Roy, who was part of the team that developed the rickshaw.

Hailing the innovation, Union science and technology minister Kapil Sibal said: "There is a need for urban transport which is comfortable and affordable for the poor. The Soleckshaws will be their Nano.''

Swifter and environment-friendly, Soleckshaws are, therefore, being seen as the new face of urban transport for short distance rides to neighbourhood schools and nearby Metro stations from home. Inaugurating the Soleckshaw at Chandni Chowk, chief minister Sheila Dikshit said: "It's a sturdy mode of transport which is functioning on clean energy. We will discuss with the police on where all it can ply and for how much distance.''

Hoping that the corporate sector will step in to manufacture these rickshaws for their low pricing and environment-friendly technology, Sibal said: "They can be used near the Taj Mahal and other monuments as their carbon foot print is zero. It is expected that the rickshaw-puller will be able to earn more than Rs 4000 a month and these rickshaws will not be as physically taxing for them.'' Complete with mobile recharging facilities and FM radio, these rickshaws cost Rs 7,000 the same as the old ones.

In Delhi, the Centre for Rural Development (CRD), an NGO, will drive the pilot project. Dr Pradip Kumar Sarmah, CRD executive director, said: "We are hoping to start using the four rickshaws launched today between Red Fort and Old Delhi Railway Station and the charge will be Rs 15. This will be a pre-paid service.''

Director general, CSIR, Samir K Brahmachari said: "The advanced versions of the Soleckshaws will have better aesthetics and a speed of 15kmph and will be ready for a full-fledged launch before the Commonwealth Games 2010. This pedicab is easy to drive on plain as well as uphill roads.'' The Soleckshaws were flagged off at Durgapur on August 17.

The battery re-charge station has been made near the Chandni Chowk Metro station and a rickshaw-puller will be given an alternative battery while his battery is being re-charged. It will cost Rs 45 to get the battery re-charged which can run till 70 km before dying out.

Said Brahmachari: "The designs of the rickshaws can be copied by anyone. But quality control will be done as the motors will bear the logos along with the batteries. We hope that the cost of the rickshaws is around the same as that of the current rickshaws at Rs 7,000 as we will earn carbon credits for them.'' CSIR is also looking at possibilities of modifying the rickshaws plying currently so that they can be made battery-operated.

Honda Insight's Disappointing Mileage

FROM BLOG: EcoGeek.org - EcoGeek - Technology for the Environment

Honda has just released a smattering of new details on it's all-new Insight. The car will be the cheapest hybrid vehicle available when it goes on sale in the spring of 2009, but it won't be the most efficient.

I was truly hoping that the new Insight would take after its father. And while, obviously, it couldn't have hit the ridiculous numbers (beyond 70 mpg) of the original, tiny, two-seater Insight, I was at least hoping it would beat the Prius. But alas, the Insight will come in right around Honda's current hybrid offering, the hybrid Civic, about 42 mpg.

So what makes this car so great then, if it has the same mileage as a hybrid Civic and worse than the Prius?

Well, a few things, actually.

  1. It's cheaper than either the Prius ($22k) or the Civic Hybrid ($23.5k). So despite being less efficient, it might be more green just because more people will buy them. Honda is banking on selling 200,000 of them per year...a lofty goal.
  2. It's a dedicated hybrid...the only one besides the Prius (and the old Insight, if you want to count it.) Which isn't important at all for the environment, but it's important for people's desire to want to buy them. It's like having the whole car be a bumper sticker that says "I'm on the cutting edge of green technology!"
  3. It's pretty. Again, not important for the environment, but important when you're trying to sell 200,000 of them a year.
  4. Going from 40 to 50 mpg doesn't actually save all that much gas. Don't believe me, see our article on why MPG is a stupid measurement.

So yes...we want one. But we'd actually rather have a Volt, or some other car that doesn't burn any gas at all under normal circumstances. But I predict broad consumer appeal for the Insight...I think my wife is harboring a secret desire for one, so that may be a point of conflict between us.


Google Attempts To Do Something Good in Addition to Doing No Evil

FROM BLOG: PROFY - Multi-author blog about Web 2.0.

Google Do something goodIn addition to increasing its internet power, Google has decided now is a good time to help save the Earth until it is too late. So yesterday Google has come up with a $4.4 trillion Clean Energy 2030 plan. The plan is intended to solve many of the acute energy and environmental problems in the country. Google suggests this plan for the public discussion which could eventually make the US government implement some of the plan’s ideas.

According to this plan green living will arrive only 22 years and 4.4 trillion dollars later but it does not sound too ambitious and many of the ideas look to be absolutely realistic - so implementing them must be possible if the next administration chooses environment as one of its priorities.

The plan consists of a few basic ideas. First of all, the plan is aimed at reducing coal share in energy production by switching mainly to wind, solar, and geothermal energy sources. Another important factor is reducing oil and gas consumption - mainly by replacing existing cars with electric and hybrid ones by offering various incentives for citizens to purchase more environmentally friendly alternatives. Another aspect is to stimulate wiser consumption of energy by citizens by using smart meters at home so that we knew exactly what we consume. For further details everyone is invited to visit a dedicated Knol page where Google describes the clean energy plan in details (finally a reason to visit Knol, by the way).

Google’s concerns over environment are no doubt very timely given the fact that the US currently is one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases (if not the largest - there is some serious uncertainty in the US and China competition in this dubious competition). Besides, the US is the only developed country that has not ratified the Kyoto protocol that is intended to help improve the global warming problem. So at least taking some actions locally sounds like a good idea - and something definitely very much needed.

It is of course quite difficult to imagine the government that is resisting all international attempts to make the US manufacturers reduce greenhouse gases emission to follow the green plan suggested by Google. But there could be some hope for the plan since the introduction blog post stated: “With a new Administration and Congress - and multiple energy-related imperatives - this is an opportune, perhaps unprecedented, moment to move from plan to action”. Hopefully this somehow means that Eric Schmidt and the energy team have some reasons to hope that his initiatives will have a chance for support with legislators - where everyone else (including the United Nations) failed.

Actually I seem to see slightly selfish aspect in the plan for Google as well. the thing is that such a plan is quite logical given the fact that Google itself has already invested some $45 million in various startups working with wind, solar, and geothermal energy. While it is obvious that any large-scale actions are supposed to happen with government support only, it is equally obvious that for such startups to start working efficiently (and generate revenue) it is a prerequisite that their technologies are needed in the country. So implementation of such a plan will probably also result in some additional income to Google through the startups it invested in.

Right now chances are the financial crisis will simply make manufacturers cut on emissions and the US will still have some fresh air to breath - at least until this plan (or some of the previously introduced similar plans) is implemented and the US energy consumption is all environmentally friendly. In the meanwhile I will stay wondering how long it will take Google to come up with some initiative to save our sinful souls (hopefully globally).

Capturing CO2 Directly from the Air

FROM BLOG: AccuWeather.com Global Warming Center - AccuWeather.com's Global Warming Center is an open forum that looks at every side of the issues of global warming and climate change with scientific clarity.
Researchers at the University of Calgary in Canada have developed a simple machine that directly pulls carbon dioxide from the air. Professor David Keith. The project is led by climate change scientist David Keith, who is also the director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy’s (ISEEE) Energy and Environmental Systems Group and a professor of chemical and petroleum engineering. Keith is also Canada's Research Chair in Energy and Environment. Air capture is different than the carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology which is a key part of the Alberta and federal governments’ strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. CCS involves installing equipment at, for example, a coal-fired power plant to capture carbon dioxide produced during burning of the coal, and then pipelining this CO2 for permanent storage underground in a geological reservoir. Air capture, on the other hand, uses technology that can capture – no matter where the capture system is located – the CO2 that is present in ambient air everywhere, according to the University of Calgary press release. Keith and his team have shown that they can capture more CO2 than the energy needed to run the machine, which is very important. There are still some major issues with this project......... --Where would the captured CO2 be stored? One possibility would be Alberta's oil sands tar fields. --Potential high costs for the commercialization of this project. Nevertheless, the relatively simple, reliable and scalable technology that Keith and his team developed opens the door to building a commercial-scale plant. By the way, there is a link to the technical details of the project at the bottom of the press release.


EcoJet: The Prius of the Skies

FROM BLOG: Scientific Blogging - 25 of the world's top scientists write on the latest developments in space, medicine, biology,earth science, physics and neuroscience.

As the global demand for air travel increases, so too does the demand to decrease the environmental impact of flight. The answer may lie in the technological advances made by the next generation of short-haul commercial aircraft currently in development by British low-cost airline, EasyJet. The unique design of EasyJet’s “EcoJet” promises a 50% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2015.

The aircraft will incorporate the latest research by airframe and engine manufacturers around the world – all of which can be incorporated into an aircraft that should be in operation by 2015. The projection for the 50% CO2 reduction is based on the findings from the latest research by industry leaders and will come from the engines (25%), the lightweight airframe (15%) and from improvements to air traffic control technology and design (10%).

EasyJet EcoJet


One of the key design changes made in the EcoJet, is the use of rear-mounted “open-rotor” engines. The reason behind this is simple physics. The environmental performance (fuel efficiency) of a modern jet engine is related to the mass of air that the fan can move, which is driven by the rotor diameter of the fan blades - the larger the fan, the greater the propulsive efficiency. Conversely, containing such a large diameter fan in a casing would have significant weight and drag penalties. In the short-haul sector of the market, unducted fan (open rotor) engines offer unrivalled environmental performance due to their higher propulsive efficiency. However, there are significant design penalties in fixing such a large engine under a wing of such a small aircraft, making rear mounting of the engines the optimum solution.

EasyJet: Open Rotor Engines and Forward Swept Wings

The EcoJet also employs an efficient forward-swept wing design. One of the primary methods of reducing fuel burn is by reducing drag. Conventional jet aircraft currently suffer increased drag from turbulent airflow over their wings.

A forward swept wing however, enables airflow from wing tip to wing root; and a wing profile that provides laminar flow over a significant proportion of the wing.

Forward Swept Wings- Airflow

Laminar flow is the smooth, uninterrupted flow of air over a wing, and is essential to lift. When the smooth flow of air is interrupted over a wing section, turbulence is created which results in a loss of lift and a high degree of drag. The EcoJet’s use of a forward-swept configuration will prolong laminar flow and greatly reduce drag during cruising speeds.

Laminar Flow

The requirements of a laminar flow wing will dictate a slightly slower design cruise speed – Mach 0.75 (570.9 mph, 918.8 km/h) compared to Mach 0.78/0.79 for today’s conventional designs. On the average short haul sector this would add 3-10 minutes to the flight, but it is anticipated that air traffic control improvements and faster turn-around times on the ground will compensate for this increase in flight time.

The EcoJet will have at least 3 full size doors, allowing airlines to board passengers through all three doors, speeding up turn-around times. Even boarding from a single jetbridge connected to the central pair of doors will speed up boarding times, as passengers would be able to head either up or down the aircraft upon entrance instead of forming a single line once inside. The EcoJet will also be a more autonomous aircraft, requiring less ground equipment -- e.g. as the fuselage is closer to the ground, a belt loader will not needed for the bulk loading and unloading of baggage.

The current average trip length in the short-haul market is around 500 nautical miles (575 miles, 926 km) and 98% of all commercial flights in the 120-240 seat segment are below 2,000 nautical miles (2,302 miles, 3,704 km). Therefore the design range of the EcoJet will be 2,000 nm or less. This reduction of the design range will reduce the weight and size of the aircraft, and will therefore further increase its fuel efficiency.

Additional weight reductions will be realized through the use of advanced weight-reducing materials similar to those used in current projects like the Boeing 787 -- which itself is estimated to be 27% more fuel efficient than the aircraft it will replace in many fleets. The wings of the EcoJet are to be manufactured out of carbon fiber composites.

The EcoJet will provide 150-250 seats in single class configuration, and 130-220 seats in a 2-class offering. In easyJet’s current configuration and operation, the projection for the eco-liner would generate less than 47g of CO2 per passenger km (0.167 lb/passenger mile). For comparison, EasyJet’s current operations generate 97.5g of CO2 per passenger km (0.346 lb/passenger mile), the Toyota Prius emits 104g of CO2 per kilometer (0.369 lb/mi); and the European car industry has recently been given a target to achieve 130g of CO2 per kilometer (0.461 lb/mi).

Speaking at a press conference to unveil the EcoJet, Andy Harrison, EasyJet Chief Executive, said:

“The aviation industry has an excellent record in reducing the environmental footprint of aircraft. Today’s aircraft are typically 70% cleaner and 75% quieter than their 1960s counterparts. Now we are planning the next generation that will help towards taking the plane out of the emissions equation.”

“The EcoJet represents the next major step forward in airframe and engine technology. The lightweight structure and open-rotor engines are based on technologies that are being developed right now by the major manufacturers. The ‘EasyJet EcoJet’ is realistic and it is achievable.”

Ocean "dead zones" spread, fish more at risk

The number of polluted "dead zones" in the world's oceans is rising fast and coastal fish stocks are more vulnerable to collapse than previo
usly feared, scientists said on Monday.

The spread of "dead zones" -- areas of oxygen-starved water -- "is emerging as a major threat to coastal ecosystems globally," the scientists wrote in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Such zones are found from the Gulf of Mexico to the Baltic Sea in areas where algae bloom and suck oxygen from the water, feeding on fertilizers washed from fields, sewage, animal wastes and pollutants from the burning of fossil fuels.

"Marine organisms are more vulnerable to low oxygen content than currently recognized, with fish and crustaceans being the most vulnerable," said Raquel Vaquer Suner of the Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies in Spain.

"The number of reported hypoxic (low oxygen) zones is growing globally at a rate of 5 percent a year," she told Reuters.

Her study with a colleague showed that the number of "dead zones" had risen to more than 140 in 2004 from almost none until the late 1970s.

Hundreds of millions of people depend on coastal fisheries for food. Crustaceans such as crabs, lobsters and shrimps are less able to escape from low-oxygen waters than fish.

Higher temperatures tied to global warming, blamed by the U.N. Climate Panel on human use of fossil fuels, may aggravate the problem of "dead zones," partly because oxygen dissolves less readily in warmer water, the study said.

The first "dead zones" were found in northern latitudes such as Chesapeake Bay on the U.S. east coast and Scandinavian fjords. Others have been appearing off South America, Ghana, China, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Portugal and Britain.

The study said that most scientists had until now reckoned that oxygen levels could fall to 2 milligrams per liter of sea water before the water was considered starved of oxygen.

But many creatures were far more sensitive. Larvae of one type of crab found off eastern Canada and the United States started suffering at oxygen levels of 8.6 mg per liter, just below normal levels.

"Currently used thresholds ... are not conservative enough to avoid widespread mortality losses," the scientists wrote. They urged a revised minimum of 4.6 mg of oxygen per liter as the lowest before water was considered hostile to life.

Radiation from mobile towers wipes out birds

Set a bird song as your mobile ringtone. For that may soon be the only way you get to hear from our winged friends — studies show that the increasing number of cell phone towers in cities is bringing down bird population.

While studies in Spain and Belgium have established the ill-effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted by cell phone masts on birds, a study to be published next month by a team in Panjab University has found that EMR can damage bird eggs and embryos.

The study, conducted in Chandigarh, is applicable to all Indian cities where cell phone masts are proliferating. Chennai has 4,000 cell phone towers, compared to about 200 in Chandigarh.

Researchers at the Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON), Coimbatore, say there are enough reasons to attribute bird mortality to such radiation.

"Cell phones and towers emit a very low frequency of 900 or 1,800 MHz, called microwaves. Studies have found that they can cause thin skulls of chicks and thin egg shells,” says Dhanya R, a researcher at SACON.

The team at the Centre for Environment and Vocational Studies of Panjab University, headed by RK Kohli, exposed 50 eggs to EMR for durations of five minutes to 30 minutes. "All the 50 embryos were damaged. It’s almost like being microwaved," Kohli told TOI.

Chennai-based zoologist Ranjit Daniels says four of the 200-odd Chennai birds — house sparrow (Passer domesticus), redwhiskered bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus), brahmini kite (Haliastur indus) and spotted dove (Streptopelia chinensis) — have virtually disappeared.

"Birds are known to be sensitive to magnetic radiation. Microwaves can interfere with their sensors and misguide them while navigating and preying,” says Daniels.

Early in 2005, a friend threw a challenge at R K Kohli, coordinator of Centre for Environment and Vocational Studies, Panjab University: "Can you show me one sparrow on the campus?" Thinking it would be an easy task, Kohli agreed. "I won the bet, but it took me several days," says Kohli.

So, when the centre decided to study in December 2005, the impact of electromagnetic radiations (EMR), Kohli decided to include sparrows in the list of organisms that the radiations affect. Three years later, the study found microwaves (300 MHz to 300 GHz) emitted by cell phone towers and handsets responsible for damaging eggs and embryos. And that is just one of the urban factors driving out several species of birds out of the cities.

Chennai is no exception. According to zoologist Ranjit Daniels, at least four of the 200-odd species of birds of Chennai are fast disappearing. On their way out are house sparrows, redwhiskered bulbuls, brahminy kites and spotted doves.

"These are birds which have always been around. Now they are nowhere to be seen," says Daniels, attributing it to an increase in population of rodents which steal eggs, disappearing open grasslands, rising temperature and modern bird-unfriendly architecture. "House sparrows used to live in crevices of buildings. The new glass houses don’t leave any space for them," he says.

P A Azeez, senior principal scientist at Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, concurs: "Urban birds have the habit of finding an urban analogue for their wild nests. Pigeons, which are multiplying in large numbers in cities, find ventilators an analogue to their natural rocky confines. Whichever bird finds an analogue survive." That perhaps explains the case of the disappearing brahminy kites which nest only on very tall trees.

Azeez also blames the supermarket culture. "Gone are the days of malligai kadais (old provisions stores) where birds came to feed on food grains. Today everything is packaged. The colourful plants in city gardens do not offer enough nectar or fruits for these birds," he says. His research student Dhanya R adds another cultural dimension to the food scarcity when she notes that bird feeding, once a regular ritual in Tamil Nadu homes, is no longer in vogue.

Daniels adds an unusual angle when he holds trees planted by urban planners as villains. "Originally, Chennai was a coastal area with bushes suited for several birds. Big trees with large canopies are not suited for birds like the bulbul and sparrows. With the expansion of city, many of these birds are migrating to the suburbs or farther," he says.

Since man domesticated chicken some 6,000 years ago, several birds have learnt to share his habitat, but now, modernisation is driving them out. Daniels says the kind of birds will keep changing with the urban habitat.

"Sparrows might have come to Indian cities only in the last century. The Bible has repeated references of sparrows, indicating that they were in abundance in the Middle East 2,000 years ago. Tamil folklore has reference to chittukuruvi, but the word could mean any small bird," says Daniels.

The message: Birds may come and go for a few centuries, which is just a miniscule span in the evolutionary cycle. As cities continue to grow, some birds, mainly scavengers like crows would proliferate at the expense of other birds. Experts may be divided on the reasons for the disappearance of birds, but everyone agrees on one bad news: Once gone, these birds would never be back.